Combination Of Asbestos And Cigarettes Together With Underlying Asbestosis Significantly Increases One’s Risk Of Developing Lung Cancer Later In Life

A recently released study sought to determine the extent to which the combination of asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking serves to act “synergistically” so as to multiply the odds that one will develop lung cancer, especially when the person has already developed asbestosis.

This study is the subject of “Asbestos, Asbestosis, Smoking and Lung Cancer: New Findings from the North American Insulator Cohort”, which was published online in April 2013 by the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine medical journal

An April 12, 2013 report found at the ScienceDaily web site, “Asbestos Exposure, Asbestosis, and Smoking Combined Greatly Increase Lung Cancer Risk”, does a good job of summarizing this asbestos lung cancer study, as well as adding some commentary from the lead author.

As for the findings, from the April 2013 ScienceDaily report:

Among non-smokers, asbestos exposure increased the rate of dying from lung cancer 5.2-fold, while the combination of smoking and asbestos exposure increased the death rate more than 28-fold. Asbestosis increased the risk of developing lung cancer among asbestos-exposed subjects in both smokers and non-smokers, with the death rate from lung cancer increasing 36.8-fold among asbestos-exposed smokers with asbestosis.

Among insulators who quit smoking, lung cancer morality dropped in the 10 years following smoking cessation from 177 deaths per 10,000 among current smokers to 90 per 10,000 among those who quit. Lung cancer rates among insulators who had stopped smoking more than 30 years earlier were similar to those among insulators who had never smoked.

And here’s how the lead author described this new study’s findings, overall:

“The interactions between asbestos exposure, asbestosis and smoking, and their influence on lung cancer risk are incompletely understood,” said lead author Steven B. Markowitz, MD DrPH, professor of occupational and environmental medicine at the School of Earth & Environmental Sciences at Queens College in New York. “In our study of a large cohort of asbestos-exposed insulators and more than 50,000 non-exposed controls, we found that each individual risk factor was associated with increased risk of developing lung cancer, while the combination of two risk factors further increased the risk and the combination of all three risk factors increased the risk of developing lung cancer almost 37-fold.”

“Our study provides strong evidence that asbestos exposure causes lung cancer through multiple mechanisms,” said Dr. Markowitz. “Importantly, we also show that quitting smoking greatly reduces the increased lung cancer risk seen in this population.”

We will continue to watch the medical journals for study articles that focus on asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

Identification Of Gene Alterations in Asbestos-Related Cancers Like Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Shows A Synergistic Effect Of Asbestos And Tobacco Smoke

An article published by the medical journal Mutagenesis in February 2013, “Differential mutation profiles and similar intronic TP53 polymorphisms in asbestos-related lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma” shows the synergistic effect between asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking.

As background,  lung cancer has been shown to be caused by both tobacco smoke and asbestos exposure, as well as other carcinogens. Exposure to both tobacco smoke and asbestos greatly enhances that risk so that the total risk is greater than adding the individual effects (a toxicology effect called synergism). If asbestos exposure increases your chance of getting cancer by 5 times and smoking increases your chance of getting cancer by 12 times, then being exposed to both of them can increase your chances by 60 to 100 times.

From the Absract for this February 2013 Mutagenesis article, which was based on a French study:

Given the interest in defining biomarkers of asbestos exposure and to provide insights into asbestos-related and cell-specific mechanisms of neoplasia, the identification of gene alterations in asbestos-related cancers can help to a better understanding of exposure risk. To understand the aetiology of asbestos-induced malignancies and to increase our knowledge of mesothelial carcinogenesis, we compared genetic alterations in relevant cancer genes between lung cancer, induced by asbestos and tobacco smoke, and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a cancer related to asbestos, but not to tobacco smoke…. While genetic changes in [non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)] are dominated by the effects of tobacco smoke, the increase of transversions in TP53 gene is consistent with a synergistic effect of asbestos. These results may help to define cell-dependent mechanisms of action of asbestos and identify susceptibility factors to asbestos.

Lastly, we want you to know that there is evidence that quitting smoking will reduce the risk of lung cancer among people who have been exposed to asbestos dust, perhaps by as much as half after at least 5 years without smoking tobacco.


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

NC Senate Bill 429 / House Bill 415: Asbestos Lawsuit Immunity Bills Which Would Benefit ALEC Member Crown Cork & Seal And Possibly Other Companies With Asbestos Liability

North Carolina State Legislators Are Being Led Astray By The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) And Its Successor Asbestos-Related Liability Fairness Act

In North Carolina there is legislation being considered currently that offers immunity to Crown Cork & Seal (and possibly others) for asbestos liability it legally acquired when it bought another manufacturing company, Mundet Asbestos, back in 1963. In effect, this legislation, if it became law, would bailout an out-of-state corporation allowing it to escape responsibility for its business dealings and shift the burden of caring for people in North Carolina with asbestos-related diseases from the legally responsible corporate entity to the NC taxpayers.

North Carolina Senate Bill (SB) 429 filed by Sen. Harry Brown (R-Onslow) and NC House Bill (HB) 415 filed by Rep. Jacqueline Schaffer (R-Mecklenburg), Rep. John Blust (R-Guilford), and Rep. Tom Murry (R-Wake) were filed in late March 2013. These pieces of proposed legislation are identical and based on a model bill created by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) Successor Asbestos-Related Liability Fairness Act — that 16 states have now passed and which gives virtual immunity to corporations that purchased an asbestos-making company in the past.

This proposed legislation recently filed in North Carolina — and  which has been made law in 16 other states, already — says that if one company purchased another company which had manufactured asbestos-containing products, the parent company is only liable to people who developed an asbestos disease or cancer like mesothelioma due to being exposed to that asbestos product up to the amount the parent paid for the acquired company.

This law would mean that companies like Crown, Cork and Seal (CC&S) would be immune from any and all future asbestos and mesothelioma lawsuits because CC&S has already paid out more in asbestos lawsuits than it paid for Mundet 50 years ago, back in 1963.

It is important to known that the dangers associated with asbestos exposure have been known since the early 1930s. Still the asbestos industry hid the facts, exposed workers and families, and now nearly 10,000 Americans are killed by asbestos diseases every year.

Essentially, CC&S bought an asbestos company and, rather than be stuck with Mundet’s legal liabilities pursuant to well-established tort law, CC&S wants to undo their bad business decision (in hindsight) and go to the state legislatures by means of ALEC to make this happen for them.

Not a bit surprising to me, at least, is the fact that Crown, Cork and Seal (CC&S) is a member of ALEC, according to Source Watch.

States where this asbestos lawsuit immunity law has passed thus far are Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Nebraska, North Dakota ,Texas, Wyoming, and Utah.

As a North Carolina asbestos-mesothelioma attorney, I am opposed to NC SB 429 and NC HB 415 and I urge our state legislators in Raleigh to not join the states above that have the dubious distinction of having been led astray by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and its Successor Asbestos-Related Liability Fairness Act.

In order to learn more about why this ALEC asbestos immunity legislation should be defeated in North Carolina, see this Lawyers.com article, “ALEC Puts the Screws to Asbestos Victims”. And thereafter, if you live in North Carolina or you have been affected by an asbestos disease or cancer like mesothelioma, you should contact one or more of the following NC legislators and voice your opposition to NC SB 429 and NC HB 415  – which may be good for ALEC and its corporate members like Crown Cork & Seas (CC&S) but is absolutely no good for the people of North Carolina.

Those North Carolina legislators who are being led astray by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and its Successor Asbestos-Related Liability Fairness Act are:

Sen. Harry Brown (R-Onslow);

Rep. Jacqueline Schaffer (R-Mecklenburg);

Rep. John Blust (R-Guilford); and,

Rep. Tom Murry (R-Wake).


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

Increased Risk Of Pleural Mesothelioma Where There Was Asbestos Exposure Together With Mineral Wool And/Or Silica Exposure, Also (i.e., Co-exposure)

The medical journal American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine published this article early online on March 7, 2013:   “Pleural Mesothelioma and Occupational Co-exposure to Asbestos, Mineral Wool and Silica”.

From the Abstract for this new medical journal article about mesothelioma:

Rationale: Occupational co-exposure to asbestos and other fibers or particles could modify the carcinogenicity of asbestos with regard to pleural mesothelioma.

Objectives: To estimate associations between pleural mesothelioma and occupational mineral wool [(MW)] and silica exposure and to study the impact of occupational co-exposure on the risk of pleural mesothelioma….

Conclusion: Our results are in favour of an increased risk of pleural mesothelioma for subjects exposed to both asbestos and [mineral wool (MW)] or asbestos and silica.

This March 2013 article was based on a French pooled case-control study.

We will continue to monitor the literature for medical developments concerning mesothelioma (“meso”).


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

Amateur Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Home Renovators Exposed To Asbestos Can Develop Mesothelioma, Asbestos Lung Cancer, Or Asbestosis

This March 7, 2013 newspaper article, “Renovators the ‘third wave’ of asbestos victims”, was published in Australia, but the points it makes are valid here in the United States and elsewhere around the world. To get your attention, perhaps, the sub-headline for this article refers to asbestos as the “silent killer”.

The first wave of victims were those exposed as part of the asbestos mining industry, the second wave was the tradesmen who worked with asbestos products in buildings.

“The third wave is home renovators,” Mr Slevin said.

“That’s people pulling up carpet and the underlay, people pulling out bathrooms, doing some of their own under-house work and being exposed.”

It is these people who are adding to the numbers of people being diagnosed with asbestos-related cancer….

“Despite a general sense that the problem’s been fixed after asbestos was banned around 1983.

“Asbestos was a very good building product, it was cheap and had a number of very useful purposes.

“It’s very common in property built, particularly in Western Australia at least, from the mid 1940s to the early 1980s so that means there’s still a lot of asbestos in those properties, domestic and public.”

Home renovators

It’s estimated that two out of three homes built in Australia between World War 2 and the early 1980s still contain asbestos and it’s those houses that are now being renovated or modified to suit new owners.

There is also a new generation of home renovators and tradespeople who were born after asbestos was banned and may not easily recognise the deadly product for what it is….

“So, the bottom line is it’s still around, it’s gone off the radar, people are still being exposed to it and the number of cases of asbestos-related diseases is still going up.

If you or someone you know does DIY home renovations or repairs, be mindful of older products which may contain asbestos during your work.

As this article points out, asbestos is not called the “silent killer” for nothing.


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

Asbestos Lung Cancer Cases: Number Of Filed Lawsuits Increasing Across The U.S.

In Recent Years And Going Forward, Malignant Claims Such As Mesothelioma And Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer Will Continue To Lead Asbestos Litigation New Filings

While malignant mesothelioma (“meso”) claims get the most attention in the ongoing asbestos litigation, the asbestos lung cancer lawsuits are significant legal claims, also.  These “other” asbestos-related cancer cases have been increasing in number over recent years and that trend is expected to continue in the U.S. over the next several years.

According to the American Lung Association Fact Sheet, in 2012 an estimated 226,160 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed.

Where that diagnosis was made in a worker who might have been exposed to asbestos 20 years or more ago, it is likely that this past asbestos exposure played a role in causing the asbestos worker’s lung cancer.

This asbestos “link” to the lung cancer would be present even if the worker smoked cigarettes insofar that the combination of smoking and asbestos exposure acts in synergy to greatly multiple the risk of that worker developing lung cancer.  Put differently, there is a greater risk of lung cancer when there is asbestos exposure for a worker who also smoked — compared to what the lung cancer risk would be in a person who just smoked cigarettes or was just exposed to asbestos in the past.

In the leading asbestos filing jurisdictions of New York City, Philadelphia, Madison County, Illinois, and California there has been a marked increase in the number of asbestos lawsuits filed that involve lung cancer — with this upward trend is seen less obviously all across the country.

And, in fact, we have been getting a growing number of Case Evaluation submissions for possible asbestos-related lung cancer lawsuits this past year.

We have more information about asbestos lung cancer and mesothelioma available at out Asbestos-Mesothelioma.com web site.

See also the Lung Cancer Awareness page at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web site.


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

The Number Of Malignant Mesothelioma Cases Diagnosed Each Year In The U.S. Is At An All Time High

Unfortunately There Will Be An Estimated 2500 to 9300 New Cases Of Mesothelioma Annually Over The Next 20 Years

According to the following sources and projection models, the number of newly diagnosed asbestos-mesothelioma cases is at an all time high and this alarming situation will likely remain with us for the next 40 years or so.

In more detail, first, it is forecasted that anywhere from 2,500 to 9,300 new cases of malignant mesothelioma (“meso”) —  mostly pleural mestothelioma, but also patients diagnosed with peritoneal and pericardium mesotheliomas — will be diagnosed in the U.S. annually over the next 20 plus years.  See:

Projected Excess Deaths from All Asbestos-Related Cancers in Selected Occupations and Industries, United States, 1965-2029, Based on Study by Nicholson et al. (1982); and Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, Clegg L, Horner MJ, Howlader N, Eisner MP, Reichman M, Edwards BK (eds).

SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2004, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/, based on November 2006 SEER data submission (last visited 10/12/2012).

Second, the number of newly diagnosed mesothelioma cases is not predicted to return to background levels until 2055.  See:

Bertram Price and Adam Ware, Mesothelioma Trends in the United States: An Update Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Data for 1973 through 2003. Am. J. of Epidemiol 2004; 159:107-112

We will continue to monitor the medical literature for other sources of similar information concerning asbestos-mesothelioma diagnosis statistics, i.e., the number of new meso cases projected per year in the United States.


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

News Report Of Two Mesothelioma Deaths Show Similarities And Differences In These Types Of Asbestos Cases

An October 30, 2012 article, “Two more die from “dreadful” mesothelioma”, published by a newspaper in the United Kingdom (UK) serves to show how asbestos-mesothelioma cases can be very similar yet very different in their sets of relevant facts.

Keith Ison, 62, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in March 2012 and died on July 6, just three months after his diagnosis.  An autopsy found a tumor encasing his right lung and tiny fibers of asbestos were found in the lung.  Mr. Ison had told doctors he was exposed to asbestos when working as a builder for a company between 1971 and 1973.

Dennis Grimsey, 81, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in April 2012 and died about three months, on July 8.  An autopsy revealed his left lung was encased in a tumor and asbestos fibers were found in the lung.  However, in this instance, Mr. Grimsey had not been aware he had been exposed to asbestos, although he said he had worked briefly in the construction industry many years earlier.

The similarities for these two asbestos-mesothelioma death cases are:

  • relative brief period of asbestos exposure;
  • the asbestos exposure was many years before the mesothelioma diagnosis; and,
  • death within a few months after the mesothelioma was diagnosed.

The differences are:

  • the age at death: 62 years old vs. 81 years old; and,
  • one individual recalled working with or around asbestos-containing products, while the other was unaware of when or where he had been exposed to asbestos.

Even though these mesothelioma case reports come out of the UK, they are instructive as to how asbestos causes mesothelioma in people many years after their asbestos exposure, whether they knew how they were exposed to asbestos or not.


 Mesothelioma, Asbestos, and Legal Compensation: Basic Facts

Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation Form
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

An Asbestos-Mesothelioma Death In The UK That Hits Home With Anyone Who Has Lost A Loved One To An Asbestos Disease

The title of this news article from the United Kingdom (UK) speaks to all who have been affected by asbestos and mesothelioma, regardless of where one lives:

 ’He just hoped he would be one of the lucky ones.  We were all devastated that he wasn’t’.

In this instance, it was Michael Wareham (on the left in picture below) who died in 2010 of mesothelioma, an asbestos-related cancer, at age 73.

Michael Wareham, left, who died in 2010 of an asbestos-related cancer, aged 73.

 

From that UK news article:

He claimed he was regularly exposed to the dust when he worked at the Watford Timber Co Ltd in the 1950s and 1960s as a joiner and machinist, cutting asbestos sheets. Years later, when he learned of the dangers of the material, he told his family he hoped he would be one of the lucky ones, but unfortunately they were left heartbroken.

Someone like Michael Wareham or his family here in the U.S. may be entitled to legal compensation from an asbestos lawsuit or a workers compensation claim filed by an asbestos attorney because asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma, asbestos cancers like lung cancer, and asbestosis.

While I handle these asbestos cases I surely wish that my services were not needed and that no one went through what Michael Wareham and his family did.

Mesothelioma incidence projections in South East England

Quoted from http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/40/4/965.abstract

Mesothelioma incidence projections in South East England

Abstract

We estimated the past and future age-standardised incidence rates of mesothelioma by birth cohort and by period of diagnosis in South East England.

We extracted data on patients diagnosed with mesothelioma (International Classification of Diseases-10 C45) between 1960 and 2009 from the Thames Cancer Registry. We calculated the age-standardised incidence rates using the European standard population. We used age-cohort and age-period modelling to estimate the age-specific incidence rates for the 1900 to 1950 birth cohorts and the 1935 to 2034 calendar periods.

A much more pronounced increase in mesothelioma incidence between 1972 and 2007 was observed in males than in females. In both sexes, the incidence rates increased in successive generations up to the 1945 birth cohort. Projection of rates in the future showed an increase in incidence in males until 2022 and a decrease thereafter. Among females, the incidence rate was predicted to increase gradually until reaching its maximum around 2027, and to remain stable thereafter.

The occurrence of mesothelioma is closely linked to occupational exposure to asbestos in the 1960s and 1970s and, due to the long latency period, the incidence of mesothelioma is projected to increase until the 2020s.

Law Offices of Thomas J. Lamb, P.A.
1908 Eastwood Road, Suite 225
Wilmington, NC 28403
Tel: (800) 426-9535
[email protected]
Disclaimer and Copyright